Hello
When using an input mask (for example, in the input field "phone"), the assumption of a proposed first name is incorrect by only taking the last letter of the name.
However, if the input field "phone" does not have a mask definition, the assumption of the suggested name is correct.
You will find an error documentation in the attatchemens (please rename the extention cf5bak with cf6bak - cf6bak is not allowed to upload :-(
Thanks
When using an input mask (for example, in the input field "phone"), the assumption of a proposed first name is incorrect by only taking the last letter of the name.
However, if the input field "phone" does not have a mask definition, the assumption of the suggested name is correct.
You will find an error documentation in the attatchemens (please rename the extention cf5bak with cf6bak - cf6bak is not allowed to upload :-(
Thanks
I second this error.
Hello Max
What is the status of this error? In the version 6.0.9 apparently nothing has changed.
Best regards
Peter
What is the status of this error? In the version 6.0.9 apparently nothing has changed.
Best regards
Peter
Hi Peter,
What is the mask used ? in the image you are using a phone mask and the auto complete value is a name.
You could also turn off the autocomplete setting of that field using the "Extra attributes" box if a mask is going to be used anyway.
Best regards,
Max
What is the mask used ? in the image you are using a phone mask and the auto complete value is a name.
You could also turn off the autocomplete setting of that field using the "Extra attributes" box if a mask is going to be used anyway.
Best regards,
Max
Hi Max
It is a misunderstanding. The error only occurs if a different field with a mask is used in the same form. The autocomplete refers to a normal text field (without mask definition). You will find a corresponding documentation in the appendix.
Best regards,
Peter
It is a misunderstanding. The error only occurs if a different field with a mask is used in the same form. The autocomplete refers to a normal text field (without mask definition). You will find a corresponding documentation in the appendix.
Best regards,
Peter
Hi there, I have the same problem.
You may using any type of mask and will nothing has changed.
Only in CF v6.
You may using any type of mask and will nothing has changed.
Only in CF v6.
Hi,
Bug confirmed and fixed in the next update!
Best regards,
Max
Bug confirmed and fixed in the next update!
Best regards,
Max
This topic is locked and no more replies can be posted.